Menu
FOUNDER
Amardeep Malik
Amardeep Malik founded Cortavian after a career spent close to consequential technology and commercial decisions—where extensive analysis, specialist advice and executive sponsorship still did not ensure that the governing judgement had been independently tested.
Experience at the point of commitment
Amardeep’s background spans senior technology procurement, complex commercial decisions and large negotiations within global, regulated organisations—where technology, governance, risk, economics and competing stakeholder interests had to be reconciled before commitment.
He has held responsibility for major enterprise technology commitments involving executive sponsors, finance, legal, risk, security, technical specialists and external suppliers. These were not decisions made from a single business case or one professional perspective. Evidence, commercial interests, operational dependencies, competing priorities and material uncertainty all had to be brought together before an organisation committed.
His role was not simply to negotiate the resulting agreement. It required testing the logic behind the commitment: what problem was actually being solved, what assumptions the preferred case depended on, which alternatives had been dismissed, where risk was being transferred and whether the evidence justified proceeding.
This experience placed him repeatedly at the point where detailed analysis had to become an accountable decision—and where the first task was often to establish what was actually being decided before commitment formed around an answer.
Cortavian does not depend on a claim that its founder knows every industry. Its discipline grew from repeated experience of clarifying consequential decisions, testing the logic connecting specialist inputs and making unresolved assumptions visible before capital, reputation and organisational momentum became attached to the preferred course.
The recurring weakness
A consistent pattern became visible.
Individual workstreams could be rigorous. Legal, financial, commercial, technical and operational specialists could each perform their mandates properly. Senior stakeholders could devote considerable time and attention to the opportunity.
Yet the judgement combining those inputs could still remain insufficiently challenged.
The apparent question was often not the governing decision. Assumptions could become treated as facts. Alternatives could narrow before they had been properly tested. As sponsorship, time and organisational effort accumulated around a preferred answer, challenging the direction became progressively harder.
The work can be rigorous. The judgement can still be wrong.
The weakness was structural. Important decisions often had many contributors, but no independent discipline explicitly responsible for testing the combined judgement before commitment.
Why he established Cortavian
Amardeep established Cortavian in response to that gap.
Cortavian defines its work as decision diligence: the independent, structured testing of the judgement behind an important decision before commitment.
It does not replace the specialist work supporting a decision. It examines how the evidence, assumptions, alternatives, dependencies, risks and unresolved questions have been combined into the recommendation to proceed.
The purpose is not to guarantee that every outcome will be correct. It is to ensure that an important commitment has faced independent challenge while the decision can still be changed.
See how Cortavian tests a decisionA discipline shaped by practice
Cortavian’s approach reflects the discipline Amardeep developed around consequential commitments: clarify the real decision, separate evidence from assumption, challenge the preferred case, examine credible alternatives and make uncertainty explicit.
That perspective now extends beyond technology procurement to acquisition and other high-consequence decisions in which several rigorous workstreams must ultimately become one accountable judgement.
Contact Cortavian