Menu
Where Decision Diligence Fits
Across the inputs.
Before the approval.
Decision Diligence does not replace specialist diligence, strategy work or the accountable decision-maker. It tests the judgement connecting them.
Tests an asset, fact pattern, risk or workstream.
Financial, legal, commercial, tax, technical and operational specialists.
Develops the rationale, plan, economics and preferred route.
Management, advisers, corporate development or strategy teams.
Tests the governing judgement constructed across the inputs.
An independent decision-diligence mandate.
Decides whether the organisation will commit.
The accountable governing body.
The gap
Many contributors.
One untested judgement.
An organisation can receive excellent advice in every workstream and still lack an independent mandate to test whether the combined evidence supports the decision being taken.
Decision Diligence occupies that missing layer.
Independent judgement.
Client responsibility.
Cortavian reaches and signs off its own judgement. The client retains responsibility for the decision.
The work is operator-assisted and human-accountable. Technology may support disciplined examination, but it does not hold the mandate, approve the recommendation or replace accountable human release.
Before commitment
Have a decision worth testing?
Start with a confidential suitability conversation. No work begins until the scope, route, timing and fee are agreed in writing.
Discuss a Decision